Showing posts with label FEATURE ARTICLE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FEATURE ARTICLE. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

FEATURE ARTICLE - DOCUMENTARY - STRUCTURE


Feature Article Planning Sheet


                                                                                                                                                                   

Topic: What is the social issue?

Audience: Who are you targeting? Which newspaper does your article appear in? Are you being conscious of the nature and style?

Truth: What is the version of truth presented in your documentary?

Opinion: What is your opinion, view or stand point on the way the documentary has positioned you? Does it matter that this documentary only presents one version of truth? If it only presents one truth, is it successful in positioning viewers to accept it?



Content: What information will you include to achieve your purpose? Will you use sequences, quotes, specific references to particular clips/devices? Remember you must RESEARCH your topic, allude to alternative ‘truths’ and attitudes of mind. What strategies, devices and techniques do the documentary makers use to position the viewer?
  




Angle: What are you hoping to communicate to your audience? Of what are you trying to persuade them? Is your tone serious?


Technical aspects
Headline
Get the readers’ attention!

By-line

Kicker
Be witty – keep the readers interested.

Lead
Contextualise the social issue and nature of the documentary.

Body 1
Perhaps deal with a particular ‘sequence’ and the devices used in it?
Start listing notes re. examples you will use to substantiate your thesis.

Body 2



Body 3



Conclusion
Style You may choose to use:
o  First person
o  Irony
o  Rhetorical questions
o  Descriptive language
o  Variety in sentence length
Format
o  Photos and captions
o  Columns
o  ‘Throw out’ quotes

Remember: This is not about your opinion on the social issue; it is about what the
documentary makers have done to try to make you think a certain thing. Whether
you agree with what they have done will be conveyed inherently in the tone, language
 and content you use to persuade your reader that the documentary was or wasn’t
 successful in positioning you to accept a certain version of truth.


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

FEATURE ARTICLE STRUCTURE - POETRY

Structure
Your Feature Article Draft
Headline


Subheading


Picture of author



By-line

Introduction establishing the relevance of the topic by relating it to something current that the readers can relate to.

Statement of Opinion – address the question how does poetry describe specific stages of life? Don’t forget to define the life stage.

Point- Introduction of  poem and explanation of its relevance to the topic of the opinion piece
Evidence
Explanation
Link


Explanation of techniques used to make meaning and appeal to audiences
Reference to poetic devices and quotes (evidence) to support point.
Evidence 1
Explanation
Evidence 2
Explanation
Evidence 3
Explanation


Context provided for the poem- explanation of poet’s experience with the life stage/poem directly.

Evidence
Evidence from text


Use of second person to involve the audience- Call to Action




Link back to statement of opinion









Wednesday, May 8, 2013

DOCUMENTARY - THE TALL MAN - FEATURE ARTICLE


“Tall Man” nothing but a Tall Story

The 2011 Documentary, “The Tall Man”, attempts to present a factual account of the events that led to the death of an Indigenous man in police custody in 2004. However, there is little wonder about whose version of reality this is….


The death of Cameron Doomadgee while in police custody on Palm Island has been one of the most controversial social and legal issues in Queensland in recent times. Nine years later, people continue to debate whether his death was a case of manslaughter by Senior Sergeant, Chris Hurley, or whether it was simply a tragic accident. Unfortunately, “The Tall Man” does little to make this clearer. Even down to its very title, this documentary does nothing but demonise police officer Hurley, while working to stir up all sorts of emotions that leave viewers feeling incredibly sad and sympathetic towards Doomadgee and his family.

Admittedly, nothing we view in the media today is without bias; however, it’s fair to say that we expect a higher level of objectivity from documentaries, as they should serve to present the facts, in order to allow viewers to make up their own minds about an issue.
Do not expect this from, “The Tall Man”.

Director, Tony Krawitz, has left little room for audiences to form their own opinions, as he utilises every trick in the book such as graphics and music, inflected cuts and montages- just to name a few. These techniques are cleverly used to position audiences to accept Hurley as a murderer, who was supposedly responsible for not only Doomadgee’s death, but the consequent suicides of his son, Eric, and friend, Patrick.

Within the first fifteen minutes of the documentary, we see a chart of a human body outlining Doomadgee’s injuries accompanied with sombre music as well as Hurley’s court recording reciting his weight and height at the time of Doomadgee’s death. As a result, viewers associate Doomadgee’s injuries with Hurley’s “tall man” size, thus, drawing the conclusion that perhaps Hurley did in fact murder Doomadgee, making us believe the one and only “truth”: Doomadgee’s death was no accident. 

This documentary is based on the novel, “The Tall Man”, by Chloe Hooper, who clearly portrays Doomadgee as the ‘victim’, as her very title insinuates that Hurley is akin to an evil spirit, the “tall man”, believed by Aborigines to live in the hills of Palm Island, and believed to come down and haunt them in the middle of the night. The opening of her novel describes the rock art in the cliffs, of British troopers with long arms and long legs exerting violent authority over the aboriginal people, some of whom are drawn dead on the ground as a result. The connection to Hurley is less than subtle.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

FEATURE ARTICLE - SATIRE - THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING EARNEST AND GREAT EXPECTATIONS

Satire: the change the world needs


They say laughter is the best medicine. But is it enough to change the world? Satirical authors desire to mend the world as they bring much more than just trivial comedy.  BY ……………………………………..



Figure 1: Algernon, Lady Bracknell and Cecily discussing about Algernon and Cecily’s engagement
almost of us have heard the saying that laughter is the best medicine. But will laughter in itself mend the fragments of society? We need a certain kind of laughter to change the world, and that is the laughter that satire brings. From trivial plays to bitter novels, satirical authors show us the follies and vices of humanity. But the real question is: can satire bring more than just trivial comedy? Ever since the writings of philosophers Horace, Juvenal and Li Po,  satire has been usilised to criticise society and bring about change..


We need a certain kind of laughter to change the world, and that is the laughter that satire brings.
Satirical authors present societal issues that they believe need  exposure. In order to catch readers’ attention, authors use satirical techniques to emphasize current controversies. Their intent is not only to make us laugh; but to highlight  fragmentation in society in the hope of piecing it back together. In other words, a true satirist is a moral crusader for change. American author E.L. Doctorow states, “Satire’s nature is to be...contemptuous of ambiguity, and so unfairly selective as to find in the purity of ridicule an inarguable moral truth.” [1] Satire is literature that not only exposes society’s absurdity, but changes the values and beliefs of society by implementing the tools of satire.





Sardonic English playwright Oscar Wilde is said to be “synonymous with satire”, and he proves through his play The Importance of
Being Earnest, showing usthat satire is more than just




trivial comedy. Targeting and criticizing the moral and social values of Victorian aristocracy, this entertaining play abides by the conventions of the Horatian style of satire, adopting a more comical style compared to the bitterness of the Juvenalian style.

Whilst Wilde regards the values of the upper classes of the Victorian era as foolish and hyprocrital rather than unjust; the desire to mend is still present. Wilde employed the tools of satire in his play to emphasise the moral rectitude of the elite. Valuing wealth and status, the Victorian upper class condoned snobbery and social injustice and Wilde attended to these flawed attributes by his use of satire.
Literature is replete with tales of dreams  of finding a rich and handsome Prince Charming. During Queen Victoria’s reign, finding an eligible spouse meant finding someone who was wealthy, not necessarily charming. One of the aristocratic obsessions portrayed in The Importance of Being Earnest was the Victorian society’s ideology on  marriage as a means to an end, rather than a loving partnership.

Wilde ridiculed  Victorian society regarding their foolish attitudes towards wealth and marriage. He hoped that by turning serious flaws into apparently trivial matters, the public’s attention would be captured and change might follow. In the play, one of the protagonists Algernon Moncrieff, proposed to Cecily Cardrew as they were  in love with each other. However, Algernon’s “snobbish…and domineering aunt” [2]Lady Bracknell, did not agree to the engagement since Cecily’s family and wealth background was unknown to her. She soon changed her mind.
  

“A hundred and thirty pounds! ...Miss Cardew seems to me a most attractive young lady, now that I look at her,” [3] announced Lady Bracknell after Cecily’s fortune was announced. Lady Bracknell’s “interest was greatly piqued” [4] as she considered Cecily as a possible match for Algernon. This reveals the folly of the Victorian attitude to marriage. Lady Bracknell’s attempt to control who married whom was for the purpose of maintaining class and wealth. Marriage came, to coin a book title,  with “great expectations”.

Figure 2: Charles Dickens – author of Great Expectations

“[Dickens’] power of evoking visual images...has probably never been equalled. When Dickens has once described something you see it for the rest of your life.”
Wilde wrapped his antagonism of Victorian elite society in a silken purse, while Charles Dickens savaged the injustices in Victorian England with biting satire. George Orwell suggested, “[Dickens’] power of evoking visual images . . . has probably never been equalled. When Dickens has once described something you see it for the rest of your life." [5] Following the style of Juvenalian satire, Dickens’ Great Expectations is written in a more cynical and serious style as compared to that of The Importance of Being Earnest. Dickens’ timeless novel demonstrates the post-Industrial Revolution model of England as it became wealthy often at the expense of the lower classes where poverty was rife. But what was so great about Great Expectations?

Common to satirists, Dickens sought to change the world through his writing, exposing the vices of the upper class. Juxtaposing luxury and love, fortune and friendship, richness and reliability, Dickens hoped to change the social morés and morals he saw enacted around him.


The story focuses on  the strange fortunes of the protagonist and narrator Philip Pirrip (Pip) – ironically, a young English orphan without any expectations at all. Numerous conflicts revolved around the acquisition of wealth and status as Pip realised that affection and love were more important than wealth and class. “As we got more and more into debt, breakfast became a hollower and hollower form.” [6]Dickens exposes the harsh reality of Victorian England through Pip as he learned the difficulty of surviving without money.


“It was not until I began to think, that I began fully to know how wrecked I was, and how the ship in which I had sailed was gone to pieces,” [7] said Pip who saw ships as a metaphor of “a life of money and privilege”. [8]Dickens portrayed the idea that Pip’s greed for money would lead him to destruction.

So...Is satire more than just trivial comedy? Satirical authors have greater expectations than just audience laughter; they wish to bring about change to the situations they find abhorrent. Like bringing medicine to those in need, satire brings  us the author’s need to change the world. Satirical authors expose the follies and vices; they seek to mend the fragmented pieces. Reaching out to change society’s perceptions on the various concerns in the world[WU1] , satire brings audiences much more than just trivial comedy.




[1] Goodreads. (2012). Retrieved 22 April from http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/310457

[2] Sparknotes. (2012). Retrieved 22 April from

[3] Wilde, Oscar. The Importance of Being Earnest. (1895). Retrieved 24 April.

[4] Sparknotes. (2012). Retrieved 25 April from http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/earnest/section5.rhtml

[6] Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. (1861). Retrieved 24 April.

[7] Dickens, Charles. Great Expectations. (1861). Retrieved 24 April.

[8] Shmoop University. (2012). Retrieved 20 April from http://www.shmoop.com/great-expectations/dreams-hopes-plans-quotes-3.html





 [WU1]You've mainly been discussing a past era, so you can’t say this.

FEATURE ARTICLE - SATIRE - THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING EARNEST AND ALICE IN WONDERLAND


Satire – Is it simply just a story with a twist?
How does the humour in satire disguise a serious message?
…………………investigates.

In times like these, it is difficult not to write satire,”

Juvenal, a Roman satirist said a long time ago. In difficult times, satirists write to voice their opinions, drawing attention to public issues. Satire in literature has one particular purpose: to focus on and criticise the problems of society and persuade people to change. In many cases satire is used, not only to create laughter, but also to show us the hypocrisy and absurdity of many authority figures.

Have you ever thought about why artists draw political cartoons? And why politicians let them do it? The artists target particular politicians because of the negative effects of their actions on society. By over-exaggeration, these artists create laughter, but often within the laughter hides a knife: a knife that cuts through the lies, making us think about what needs altering.

Rounded Rectangular Callout: “Often within the laughter hides a knife: a knife that cuts through the lies, making us think about what needs altering”it is all too easy to underestimate the importance of satire and the serious intentions of satirists to bring about change. Some people may consider satire as just simple humour; satire is much more. Satire makes us laugh, but have you ever thought about the message that is masked behind the humour?

There are many synonyms for the word “satire”, such as irony, sarcasm and wit, but some say that the best synonym for “satire” is Oscar Wilde himself. Oscar Wilde, the author of the famous play, “The Importance of Being Earnest”, was born into the upper class during the reign of Queen Victoria. The strict rules she lay down for marriage, morality and sexuality impacted on Wilde’s life. He was considered an outsider and was targeted by his society due to his homosexuality.

 Wilde disliked the authority figures of his society as they controlled what people could and could not do, therefore in many of Wilde’s works, criticism of the upper echelons of society were seen.  He wanted to bring about change and “correct” the problems that he believed were contrary to his beliefs.

In his play, Wilde’s use of the gentle styled Horatian satire not only makes the readers laugh at the hypocrisy of authority figures, it also makes them consider what can be altered to “mend” this problem. In the Victorian Era, the upper class assumed that they were entitled to enforce their rules on society. Wilde’s use of subversion, and reversal successfully targeted the upper class and its hypocritical attitudes, especially through the character of Lady Bracknell.

Lady Bracknell is a farcical character in a farcical comedy. She is used to portray the typical upper class doyenne of the time. A self-appointed matriarchal figure, she controlled those around her, dictating their actions.

Wilde showed hypocrisy in the character of Lady Bracknell, as she said that, “I am pleased to hear it. I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance” (Act I, page 132) It is ironic that she dislikes ignorance, considering she is known as an ignorant character.

“Miss Cardew seems to me a most attractive young lady, now that I look at her.” (Act III, page 179) Lady Bracknell shows her hypocrisy when she completely changes her attitude towards Cecily as soon as she hears that she’s wealthy. This shows the superficial personality of Lady Bracknell revealing that her main focus was money and status. During this era, the aristocracy put money and prospects before all else; keeping their eye on what would benefit them most. Wilde exposed this ingrained attitude and openly criticised the authority figures through his satire, twisting the knife.

During the Victorian Era, satire was a popular literary form. People in that era were not permitted to openly criticise society as the rules were very strict and repressive. By writing satirical literature, Victorian authors used humour to cloak their dissatisfaction with the flaws and hypocrisy they saw within their society.

Lewis Carroll, author of the famous book “Alice’s Adventure in Wonderland” also lived and wrote during the Victorian Era. Similar to Wilde, he was considered an outsider. It was said that Carroll was always nervous and awkward around adults, but around children, he became energised. Unlike Wilde, Carroll accepted being the outsider, content with writing about the flawed and absurd society he lived in.

Carroll’s distinctive understanding of children’s minds allowed him to write remarkable fiction that was very popular among young people. When “Alice’s Adventure in Wonderland” was first published, people criticised this book as being full of nonsense, but over time, Carroll’s use of complicated logic and satire assured this book a place amongst the great classics.

The “Wonderland” in Carroll’s novel not only mirrors Alice’s real world, it also mirrors the Victorian Society that Carroll lived in. The “Wonderland” is an absurd society full of nonsense, where strange creatures lived. By using these absurd characters and dialogue which made no sense, Carroll created humour, which masked his criticism of the aristocracy.

In Carroll’s novel, his use of Juvenalian satire created a biting and bitter quality, his knife not so subtle as Wilde’s. Carroll’s character, The Queen, is  very severe and dominating. She constantly demands people to be beheaded if they commit the tiniest mistake. Carroll’s use of exaggeration and subversion makes The Queen an absurd character. She expects everything to go her way and throws an almighty tantrum whenever something displeases her.

“The Queen turned crimson with fury, and, after glaring at her for a moment like a wild beast, screamed “Off with her head! Off--”” (Chapter 8) Through his satirical text, Carroll criticised the attitude of the elite society, who believed in their superiority, hoping he could “mend” the world that so displeased him.

During the Victorian Era, it was accepted that the upper class were in control of the all aspects of society. ““I see!” said the Queen, who had meanwhile been examining the roses. “Off with their heads!”” (Chapter 8) We all know how it feels to be controlled by those in authority, so Carroll’s message allows the readers to relate to being controlled and also understand the subversion that Carroll has used to criticise authority.

Both Carroll’s Queen of Hearts and Wilde’s Lady Bracknell mirror the supreme authority figure of the Victorian era, Queen Victoria. As Queen Victoria ruled over the whole society, the Queen of Hearts and Lady Bracknell were self-appointed officials who assumed that they were entitled to rule others while living as they pleased.

Literature is a tool that authors use to tell us different stories; stories created by imagination, stories from their own experience. In the context of satire, the messages that are given by the authors are often about problems they want to change.

Two famous Victorian-era authors, Oscar Wilde and Lewis Carroll have written satirical works which not only make us laugh at the hypocrisy and absurdity of the authority figures, they also show us the flaws and distorted side of their society. By doing this, they make us mindful about what should be altered to “mend” our society’s faults. If someone ever asks you, “what is satire?” you can answer them “satire is simply the author telling a story with a small twist, making everything absurd but meaningful at the same time.”